The only prestige weapon I feel is useful, is the MP-40. The same battles where my grandfather was obliterated by an mg42. Not much of an opinion on the mp40, doesn't seem like it's particularly worse or better than the rest of the SMGs : Mega Construx Call of Duty WWII Battle Pack Amazon Exclusive : Toys. Based off this thread the mg42 is dissatisfactory compared to the other MGs, too.
The kar98 flips a full 180 and is so broken with its scope time and accuracy that it's causing the entire community to complain about snipers and cheating. Meanwhile the luftwaffe is superior in every way to the sawed-off, with the possible exception of reload speed as I did not compare those. So essentially worse in every way from an already pretty bad shotgun. The sawed-off shotgun is an absolute joke, the damage is as bad as the toggle action except it has less range/clip size/reload speed/more spread. I haven't used it yet, but I heard lots of people saying the SVT-40 sucks more than any rifle. Originally posted by Papa Shekels:Pretty much the only complaint I can agree on is that prestige weapons do not make sense. I'm also not defending the devs, but they made the game how they wanted to make it, it's the players fault for buying it, last I checked no one was forced at gunpoint to buy COD:WW2. The DP27 carries a little more power and mobility while the Bren is weaker across the board. In terms of overall strength, the MG42 falls right in the middle of the LMG class. Wow you must think everyone is a troll then. The MG42 is one of three light machine guns in Call of Duty: Vanguard, along with the DP27 and Bren. So you are defending the devs? Saying that it is good as they've made it? With unrealistic firerates and crap guns? I only care about the MG42 atm, I am aware of other guns being not realistic too.
If you involve someones playhours its trolling.
You're complaining about how you wish you could refund the game, but yet you've played the multiplayer for 40 hours, you have had plenty of time to see how the weapons aren't realistic at all, but yet you continued to play the game. The MG-42 is OP anyways it doesn't need to fire any faster. It should've been clear to everyone that the game wasn't going to have completely realistic weapons, pretty much all cod weapons aren't represented how they actually were. Jezz, most people who write game reviews for a living in magazines and online shows, have between 3 and 12 hrs.Ĭhill out lol, not everyone who doesn't agree with you is a troll. How many hours do I need to be allowed to have an opinion about ingame content? 1000?2000? I know that CoD isn't realistic,but at least realism in terms of weapons should be applied, especially if these weapons have real names and represent real life weaponry.Īnd last, what do my hours have to do with it? Honestly, explain this to me. Sure I pick the most Iconic MG of WW2, why not? In fact, it's the prestige MG. Originally posted by zacharyb:Out of all the things to complain about and wanting to refund about, you pick the MG-42?ĬOD isn't realistic, lots of the guns aren't accurate, you also have 40 hours ffs.Īre you and other anti-logical troll who doesn't use his brain before replying? Seems like it.įor 1.